Conclusion
Sep. 30th, 2001 07:26 pmI've been thinking about this for a while. People say their journal is their own and they can write whatever they'd like in it. Sure, granted you can say whatever you'd like, but as soon as somebody has a contradictory oppinion in their comments they use their right to free speech as a rebuttal. Now this has been jiving me for a while, it doesn't seem just. There has to be another factor at work here. I think it's comments. As soon as you open your journal to commenting you loose it being wholely your own. It's public property at that point, you just co-ordinate the topic of discussion.
Think of it without the pretense of being on the internet. If it were a piece of paper in a notebook and you allowed people to write comments on your work would you say that it's your piece of expression at that point? It's that simplistic notion of ownership of what you sanction as a public space. If you don't want people in your back yard, don't let 'em in. Of course, I think a lot of people are more casual about their journal and aren't specifically sure what they want.
Think of it without the pretense of being on the internet. If it were a piece of paper in a notebook and you allowed people to write comments on your work would you say that it's your piece of expression at that point? It's that simplistic notion of ownership of what you sanction as a public space. If you don't want people in your back yard, don't let 'em in. Of course, I think a lot of people are more casual about their journal and aren't specifically sure what they want.
i do agree
Date: 2001-09-30 04:34 pm (UTC)of course, the flip-side is you miss all the sarcasm, bitching, and behind your back stabbing that could embarass one greatly the next time he makes it out to the "local haunt".
then again, guess it's not much of a flip-side. heh.
whoa, i went off on a tangent there.
*cracks whip*
owee. k, i gotta go get tied up now *g*
Re: i do agree
Date: 2001-09-30 04:55 pm (UTC)Now that's a tangent.
no subject
Date: 2001-09-30 05:05 pm (UTC)"If it were a piece of paper in a notebook and you allowed people to write comments on your work would you say that it's your piece of expression at that point? It's that simplistic notion of ownership of what you sanction as a public space."
Imagine you were my editor and you made the above quote about a book I wrote. In that case NOPE. It's my book. I may be paying you to edit for me and you'd get credited for it, and a good editor can save even the best of writers from themselves. But creatively, a comentator is still not the driving force behind any piece of writing.
I guess it depends on point of view.
go brodie.
no subject
Date: 2001-10-01 08:15 am (UTC)Wow, that response was WAY longer than I meant it to be. I really hope I didn't offend you by my comments....I'm just dealing with some of this crud myself over in MY journal....
And yeah, I'm still horny...:)