nfotxn: (Default)
[personal profile] nfotxn
My dearest American friends this is the time for you to excercise your rights to freedom of speech and assembly.
Marriage Protection Week, 2003
By the President of the United States of America
A Proclamation



Marriage is a sacred institution, and its protection is essential to the continued strength of our society. Marriage Protection Week provides an opportunity to focus our efforts on preserving the sanctity of marriage and on building strong and healthy marriages in America.

Marriage is a union between a man and a woman, and my Administration is working to support the institution of marriage by helping couples build successful marriages and be good parents.

To encourage marriage and promote the well-being of children, I have proposed a healthy marriage initiative to help couples develop the skills and knowledge to form and sustain healthy marriages. Research has shown that, on average, children raised in households headed by married parents fare better than children who grow up in other family structures. Through education and counseling programs, faith-based, community, and government organizations promote healthy marriages and a better quality of life for children. By supporting responsible child-rearing and strong families, my Administration is seeking to ensure that every child can grow up in a safe and loving home.

We are also working to make sure that the Federal Government does not penalize marriage. My tax relief package eliminated the marriage penalty. And as part of the welfare reform package I have proposed, we will do away with the rules that have made it more difficult for married couples to move out of poverty.

We must support the institution of marriage and help parents build stronger families. And we must continue our work to create a compassionate, welcoming society, where all people are treated with dignity and respect.

During Marriage Protection Week, I call on all Americans to join me in expressing support for the institution of marriage with all its benefits to our people, our culture, and our society.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim the week of October 12 through October 18, 2003, as Marriage Protection Week. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this week with appropriate programs, activities, and ceremonies.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand three, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-eighth.

GEORGE W. BUSH
This government continues to make it completely obvious that they intend to be a threat to the human rights of all Americans. What comes after protecting marriage? Extensibly single or unmarried parents could become targets that children need to be "protected" from. How soon before all Christian beliefs become government policy? How soon before America becomes a total Christian theocracy?

This dogma is so unabashedly partisan to the fundamental Christian right it's outrageous.

Date: 2003-10-06 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foodpoisoningsf.livejournal.com
That's all fine and good, but when is Divorce Week? Right after Mother's Day?

Date: 2003-10-06 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nfotxn.livejournal.com
I think so. Isn't November Child Neglect month this year? Because I think the age old tradition of neglect needs to be protected.

Date: 2003-10-06 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dizzi-d.livejournal.com
There's also "Freedom is Overrated - distract me and feed me bologna" week - don't forget that. They're talking about extending it to a year-round holiday.

Date: 2003-10-06 06:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theotherqpc.livejournal.com
you ignorant freak! *MAY* is Child Neglect month! November is Domestic Violence Appreciation month.

Date: 2003-10-06 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bitterlawngnome.livejournal.com
I wonder if the end of this road is to take children away from single parent (or "other structure" situations) and raise them to be soldiers? Wouldn't be the first empire to do so.

Date: 2003-10-06 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goofybearz.livejournal.com
This reminds me of a song from Jesus Jones called, "Welcome Back Victoria". They made a reference to Victorian Era ways in a negative way.

there is nothing to say but.....

Date: 2003-10-06 05:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oni1111.livejournal.com
WTF?????

>>We must support the institution of marriage and help parents build stronger families. And we must continue our work to create a compassionate, welcoming society, where all people are treated with dignity and respect.

--except for the sodomites...

Date: 2003-10-06 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Obviuosly this government is one of the worst and scariest of them all in the United States. What is inside this guy's head?

...and justice for all???

:: n33o ::

Date: 2003-10-06 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urso.livejournal.com
Notice it wasn't "promotion of marriage" or "marriage encouragement" or even "marriage appreciation."

It was "Protection of Marriage." That implies it has to be protected from someone or some thing.

Guess who? They're not even trying to be subtle now. It might as well be "Keep the Gays in Their Place Week."

This makes me sick.

Date: 2003-10-06 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danlmarmot.livejournal.com
Yep! If people don't get married to become parents and breed... why bother? Since it's all about the children, I think the Federal government should institute mandatory fertility tests for all marriage applicants.

Then again, some people are infertile... and in that case, the Feds should propose the 2004 National Unborn Children Registry (also known as the Leave No Scraped Child Behind act). This will allow infertile couples to be matched with the unwanted and unborn children that are saved from the abortionists!

I think such a registry can be set up for, oh, $87 billion or so.
From: [personal profile] gmjambear
- For every two marriages, one ends up in divorce.

- For every 2 couples who deserve to be married, there is one couple who shouldn't be married.

- What about people who are not married but living "in sin?"

- What about single people who choose to not get married?

- What about the people who are in an endless circle of getting married and divorced and remarry?

- What about anyone in the U.S. who is not a cristian and living in the U.S.?


"Groan!"
From: [identity profile] enigmacub.livejournal.com
Hollywood couples like Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell might actually have to split up after a healthy and stable 15 year non-marriage to each other. Their children taken away cause their parents lived in sin without the sanctity of marriage for so long. Granted after 2 years it's considered common law marriage, but we won't bring that up. Say it ain't so.

Ick!

Date: 2003-10-06 07:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urso.livejournal.com
If your stomach can handle it:
MarriageProtectionWeek.com

Re: Ick!

Date: 2003-10-06 08:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lucentnotion.livejournal.com
What a stupid website, umm I'm supposed to believe that 97% of americans are straight.. Whatever...

Date: 2003-10-06 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] infobear.livejournal.com
And how coincidental that he chose it to directly follow National Coming Out Week...

...what an ass. This administration cannot be ushered out soon enough.

Date: 2003-10-06 11:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notofthisworld.livejournal.com
My. Fucking. God.

Date: 2003-10-07 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] profundojoe.livejournal.com
If he gets re-elected, we're SO moving to Ontario.

Date: 2003-10-08 07:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shawnsyms.livejournal.com
Those of us in the rest of the world need Americans to stay there and fight for sanity!

Date: 2003-10-08 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hylandr.livejournal.com
Of we could just move the sane people to Canada and then nuke the U.S. after that if GWB wins again. (Not that he ever really won a democratic election before. But the U.S. isn't a democracy anyway...)

Date: 2003-10-08 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shawnsyms.livejournal.com
I actually think there are too many sane people in the U.S. — if they all moved up here, it would tax our infrastructure too much.

: )

Date: 2003-10-08 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hylandr.livejournal.com
I take it you've never worked tech support for U.S. customers... ;)

Date: 2003-10-07 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ranger1.livejournal.com
Dubya is so going down in 2004.

Profile

nfotxn: (Default)
nfotxn

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 18th, 2026 10:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios